Design 4 and THATS a wrap

So it's safe to say that Design 4 took my brain and changed anything I thought was real, and made it the complete opposite.

• Your work doesn't count if you can't describe the inner emotions of the drawings' soul. 
• You must use a scale, be unique, but use the scale correctly. Oh wait we never taught you how to scale for more than 3 minutes, good luck!!
• Why don't you have "landscape"? *Sees everyone turn in models with a base* SO BUILDING WITH A BASE IS ACCEPTABLE NOW.
• When you draw sections your walls, floors, and ceiling thicknesses must make sense, but remember to be unique and go outside the box with your work. Thats wrong, why did you do that. 

Whoever thought up this curriculum really has an exuberant amount of joy in melting, freezing, and chipping off the pieces of student's brains. 

So we can begin with the Savannah Georgia site trip, being that it took up most of the curriculum for the semester. 

We all drove to Savannah and took a walking tour of Downtown Savannah, starting at  Forsyth park and walking through to Porters Walk. We evaluated the way a city grid evolved and we each tied a personal niche to our experience. We were told to use that personal passion as a mold for how we evolved throughout the two sites. Some included velocity, footsteps, organization, photography, etc.   

My passion was footsteps, having to do with running and how the ground condition highlights the evolution we force off of impact. I decided that since running is a concept that has no plan when you go out to do it, all pieces of the site were fair game to build upon. 

A little while after we went through Downtown Savannah, we ventured to Fort Pulaski. We continued to the far Northern part of the site where the bunker sat below the entrance of the "dock" that went a little over where the water met the marsh land. This water line was a key component to all of our site designs. We were able to dig around the dock and bunker, but couldn't take anything from those two pieces. Everything else was fair game to build elevation upon, or dig away from. 

These two relief models allowed us to start playing with the idea of what and where we really could start to take away and add to the site. The organic pieces of the site played a heavy roll in marking what can change with time vs. by the human imprint. I utilized the idea of the ground condition and how with the human imprint, you can see the evolution's history. Just by the idea that running maps will always have a dictation on where to go, there are always other paths you can venture out to take. and with those other possibilities, the human imprint evolves the space given to them, even if it isn't printed out on a map. 

The site model I came up with took a very layered look to emphasize the ground condition and its importance to the rest of the site. The scale was at 1"=40'.

Once the site model was understood, I could zoom in to one of my spaces in the site. All together we had three spaces- the research, observation, and display space. The site model was at a scale of 1/8"=1'.

The site model took the research space. This was based on the fact how runners do make their own trails. Theres never a set trail you plan to take, of course there is always one there, but the average runner enjoys the discovery within the run. 

Research Space Diagrams (1/16"=1')

Observation Space Diagrams (1/16"=1')

Display Space Diagram (1/16"=1')

From top to bottom: Research, Observation, Display Space

This project began maybe the 1 month of the semester starting off with the Savannah trip itself. The city aspect continued into the midterm, which included the city "map" conveying our passion. We still used the same ideas when moving forward to the final project which focused on Fort Pulaski and the site we were building and taking from. 

Thanks for keeping up with me,

Michelle C. Harter